Coupling efficiency of pair-breaking radiation to the Josephson junction through the spurious antenna mode of a transmon qubit island. The junction is modelled as a real resistance Rn in parallel with the self-capacitance Cj; the radiation impedance Zrad(f) follows your chosen analytical model. ec(f) is computed from the standard conjugate-match condition. (Following Rafferty et al., arXiv:2103.06803.)
Zrad(f) = Rpeak / [1 + jQ(f/f0 − f0/f)]. Re(Zrad) peaks at f0.
Junction impedance. Above the superconducting gap the junction acts as a real
tunnel resistance Rn shunted by the self-capacitance Cj. With
τ = Rn Cj and ω = 2πf,
Zj(ω) = Rn(1 − jωτ) / (1 + ω²τ²)Re Zj = Rn / (1 + ω²τ²), Im Zj = −ωτ Rn / (1 + ω²τ²)Zj* = Re Zj + j |Im Zj| (the target match impedance).Reflection coefficient and coupling efficiency. Conjugate matching gives Γ = 0:
Γ(f) = (Zrad − Zj*) / (Zrad + Zj)ec(f) = 1 − |Γ|².
Rafferty et al. write ec = 1 − |Γ| (an amplitude-style definition); this calculator uses the standard power form
so that ∫ ec df directly gives the antenna noise bandwidth.ΔfN = ∫ ec(f) df, integrated over the plotted frequency range.Radiation-impedance models.
Zrad(f) = R0 (purely real, frequency-independent). Use for a quick "what if" estimate.Zrad(f) = Rpeak / [1 + j Q (f/f0 − f0/f)].
Re Zrad peaks at f0; Im Zrad crosses zero at f0 with negative slope (inductive below, capacitive above). FWHM ≈ f0/Q.f0 = c0 / (2L √εeff) with εeff ≈ 1 inside a 3D cavity.
Classical thin-dipole peak resistance Rpeak ≈ 73 Ω; Q ≈ 4 captures the fundamental's bandwidth crudely.f0 = c0 / (p √εeff), where p is the island perimeter and εeff ≈ ½(1 + εr) ≈ 6 on Si/sapphire. From Babinet's principle Zw Za = η²/4 ≈ 35 531 Ω²; with a one-wavelength wire loop having Rw ≈ 130–240 Ω the aperture peak is Rpeak ≈ 100–200 Ω. Default 150 Ω, Q ≈ 4.f0 = c0 / (2L √εeff). Folded-dipole wire has Rw ≈ 292 Ω, so aperture Rpeak = 35 531 / 292 ≈ 122 Ω (Rafferty et al. simulate ≈80–150 Ω). Default 100 Ω, Q ≈ 4.All three shape presets are textbook lumped approximations and ignore details that matter at the 5–20% level: finite trace thickness, substrate finite size, dielectric resonances, and proximity to ground tabs. For quantitative work use full-wave simulation (e.g. HFSS, CST, openEMS); see Rafferty et al. (Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 054012, 2021 / arXiv:2103.06803) for the numerical Zrad(f) of several specific Xmon, differential, and 3D-transmon geometries.